In Balancedialectical Behavioral Training



  1. Bandura, A., 1978, On paradigms and recycled ideologies, Cog.Res.Ther., 2: 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow, D. H., 1981, On the relation of clinical research to clinical practice: Current issues, new directions, J.Con.Clin.Psych., 49: 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth, P., Dale, B., and Ansari, J., 1984, Problem drinkers’ goal choice and treatment outcome: A preliminary study. New Directions in the Study of Alcohol Group, Members Booklet, 7: 11–32.Google Scholar
  4. Cartwright, A. K. J., 1981, Are different therapeutic perspectives important in the treatment of alcoholism? Brit.J.Add., 76: 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christie, M., 1983, Clients’ perceived needs for treatment: New Directions in the Study of Alcohol Group, Members Booklet, 6: 20–25.Google Scholar
  6. Cronkite, R. C., and Moos, R. H., 1980, Determinants of the post treatment functioning of alcoholic patients: A conceptual framework, J.Con.Clin.Psych., 48: 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies, P. L., 1962, Normal drinking in recovered alcohol addicts, Qutly.J.Stud.Alcohol, 23: 94–104.Google Scholar
  8. De Lint, J., 1981, The influence of much increased alcohol consumption on mortality rates: The Netherlands between 1950 and 1975, Brit.J.Add., 76: 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eysenck, H. J., 1984, Is behavior therapy on course? Behay.Psychotherapy, 12:2–6 (reprinted from EATB Newsletter, 1982, 7: 36–40.Google Scholar
  10. Flores, P. J., 1982, Modifications of Yalori’s Interactional Group Therapy model as a mode of treatment for alcoholism, Group, 6: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foy, D. W., Nunn, L. B., and Rychtasik, R. G., 1984, Broad-spectrum behavioral treatment for chronic alcoholics: Effects of training controlled drinking skills, J.Con.Clin.Psych., 52: 218–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gurman, A. S., and Razin, A. M., 1977, “Effective Psychotherapy: A Handbook of Research,” Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Hawks, D. V., 1971, Can clinical psychology afford to treat the individual? Bull.Brit.Psych.Soc., 24: 133–135.Google Scholar
  14. Hawks, D. V., 1981, The dilemma of clinical practice: Surviving as a clinical psychologist, in: “Reconstructing Psychological Practice,” 1. McPherson and A. Sutton, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  15. Heather, N., and Robertson, I., 1981, “Controlled Drinking,” Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  16. Hodgson, R. J., 1981, Editorial, Behay.Psych., 2: 189.Google Scholar
  17. Horverak, O., 1983, The 1978 strike at the Norwegian Wine and Spirits Monopoly, Brit.J.Add., 78: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joynson, R. B., 1970, The breakdown of modern psychology, Bull.Brit.Psych. Soc., 23: 261–269.Google Scholar
  19. Joynson, R. B., 1972, The return of mind, Bull.Brit.Psych.Soc., 25:1–10.Google Scholar
  20. Kiesler, D. J., 1966, Some myths of psychotherapy research and the search for a paradigm, Psych.Bull., 65: 110–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kopp, S., 1977, “Back to One: A Practical Guide for Psychotherapists,” Science and Behavior Books, Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  22. Laing, R. D., 1968, The obvious, in: “The Dialectics of Liberation,” D. Cooper, ed., Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  23. Ledermann, S., 1956, 1964, “Alcohol, Alcoholism, Alcoholization,” Vols. 1 2, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar
  24. Levine, H. G., 1984, The alcohol problem in America: From temperance to alcoholism, Brit.J.Add., 79: 109–119.Google Scholar
  25. Marlatt, G. A., Gordon, J. R., 1980, Determinants of relapse: Implications for the maintenance of behavior change, in: “Behavioral Medicine: Changing Health Lifestyles,” P.O. Davidson and S.M. Davidson, Brunner-Mazel, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Matnard, A., and Kennan, P., 1981, The economics of alcohol abuse, Brit.J.Add., 76: 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, W. R., 1983, Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers, Behave.Psych., 11: 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, W. R., and Baca, L. M., 1983, Two year follow-up of bibliotherapy and therapist-directed controlled drinking training for problem drinkers, Behay.Ther., 14: 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, W. R., Taylor, C. A., and West J. C., 1980, Focussed versus broad spectrum behavior therapy for problem drinkers, J.Con.Clin.Psych., 48: 590–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulford, M. A., and Fitzgerald, J. L., 1983, Changes in alcohol sales and drinking problems in Iowa, 1961–1979, J.Studies on Alcohol., 44: 138–161.Google Scholar
  31. Parry, G., and Gowler, D., 1983, Career stresses on psychological therapists, in: “Psychology and Psychotherapy: Current Trends and Issues,” D. Pilgrim, ed., Routledge and Kegan-Paul, London.Google Scholar
  32. Popham, R. E., 1970, Indirect methods of alcoholism prevalence estimation; a critical evaluation, pp.294–306, in: “Alcohol and Alcoholism; Papers Presented at the International Symposium in Memory of E.M. Jellinck, Santiago, Chille,” R.E. Popham, ed., University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  33. Roberts, K., 1983, Drinking: A sociology of leisure perspective. New Directions in the Study of Alcohol, Members Booklet, 6: 26–34.Google Scholar
  34. Room, R., 1984, The World Health Organization and alcohol control, Brit.J.Add., 79: 85–92.Google Scholar
  35. Sanchez-Craig, M., Annis, H. M., Bornet, A. R., and MacDonald, K. R., 1984, Random assignment to abstinence and controlled drinking: Evaluation of a cognitive behavioral program for problem drinkers, J.Con. Clin.Psych., 52: 390–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skog, 0.-J., 1980, Liver cirrhosis epidemiology; some methodological problems, Brit.J.Add., 75: 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skog, 0.-J., 1981, Alcoholism and social policy: Are we on the right lines? Brit.J.Add., 76: 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Szasz, T., 1979, “The Myth of Psychotherapy,” Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  39. Usher, M. L., Jay, J., and Glass, D. R., 1982, Family therapy as a treatment modality for alcoholism, J.Studies on Alcoholism, 43: 927–938.Google Scholar
  40. Weir, R. B., 1984, Obsessed with moderation: The drink trades and the drink question (1870–1930), Brit.J.Add., 79: 93–107.Google Scholar
  41. Winters, A., 1978, Review and rationale of the drinkwatchers international program, Am.J.Drug Alcohol Abuse, 5: 321–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yates, P. E., and Norris, H., 1981, The use made of treatment: An alternative approach to the evaluation of alcoholism services, Behay.Psych., 9: 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  1. In Balancedialectical Behavioral Training Certification
  2. Dialectical Behavioral Therapy Pdf
  3. In Balance Dialectical Behavioral Training Reliaslearning
  4. Training Courses Dialectical Behavior Therapy

When I first became interested in the Dialectical Behavior Therapy methods and curriculum (DBT), one of my mentors said, “Lisa, I strongly advise you NOT to get involved with this work. If you offer DBT Skills, you will attract the WORST clients! They will all be severely agitating with Borderline, Bipolar or severe mood disorders, it will be a nightmare for you!”

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is a type of cognitive-behavioral therapy that focuses on the psychosocial aspects of therapy, emphasizing the importance of a collaborative relationship, support for the client, and the development of skills for dealing with. Dialectical Behavior Therapy Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) provides clients with new skills to manage painful emotions and decrease conflict in relationships. DBT specifically focuses on. Dialectical behaviour therapy has been adapted to help people with extreme emotions. When developing DBT, Marsha Linehan pushed for a balance between acceptance and change, and recognised the. Dialectical Behavior Therapy for School Refusal (DBT-SR) is a novel intervention addressing mechanisms that maintain school refusal behavior.

I heard what she said, and I did respect her opinion, but there was something so powerfully intriguing about the evidence-based science behind DBT, and the fact that so many people were getting well from it – who had been considered “treatment resistant” prior to their DBT exposure.

I do like a challenge, however, and I was not afraid of this high risk population. Something inside me told me to continue…against the advise of this mentor, and others practitioners I knew.

So fast forward to today, six years post-DBT training, sharing the DBT curriculum with teens (14-17) and adults (18+) in my office in Westford, MA for several years now. I have had the privilege of witnessing dozens of my DBT clients, in both individual and group therapy, go through this cognitive re-structuring process, shed their false beliefs, deconstruct their traumas, grieve and move on to have healthy, happy, contented lives.

In the process, I have learned that approximately 70% of my clients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) suffer from severe co-occurring post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), related to traumas that occurred during childhood. These traumas were not processed or expressed at the time, and they caused a corruption of the client’s personality, mental and social skills.

What is dialectical behavior therapy

These unresolved traumas, when treated, often bring upon a rebirth process, and the client is no longer exhibiting the Borderline symptoms. Therefore, I humbly submit that it would serve everyone if BPD could be renamed Intense Trauma Syndrome (ITS).

Here is why:

  1. The term Borderline is heavily stigmatized in my guild. “Borderline” sounds as if someone is on the edge of a cliff about to jump, perhaps on the verge of…suicide? Murder? Something worse? Witness my mentor’s advice above, plus, each week I receive calls from clients who tell me “No one will work with me because I am Borderline.” This is frustrating and heartbreaking to me. Why is this heavily traumatized group eschewed because of their condition? Where should they go? How will they get well? If BPD was re-labeled as Intense Trauma Syndrome, I think they would be helped by more therapists! But this requires more than a branding campaign…
  2. Borderline clients often exhibit highly dissociative symptomatology, chronic suicidality, and ongoing non-suicidal self-injury. This is also a big turn-off to my guild. Many of my colleagues will NOT work with suicidal clients. Why? Too much liability, too many collateral calls, too much danger. Moreover, my clients feel as if they are tacitly shamed by the mental health profession for being Borderline. Yet I have found that this population, when they are truly sick and tired of being sick and tired, pick up these DBT Skills and other therapeutic interventions, and start their healing process. They do agree to a Safety Plan and stick with it. They learn, grow, and become healthier and successful members of society. They do recover!
  3. When I tell my Borderline clients they have Intense Trauma Syndrome, and request that they stop describing themselves as Borderline, they start to feel so much better about their emotional challenges. Many Borderline clients have described severe shame and self-hate due to their diagnosis. They feel hopeless and bereft of a cure. Receiving the Borderline diagnosis can make them feel worse! Here’s the H.O.P.E. for Borderline clients, Hold On, Pain Ends.

Solution Focused Therapy

Balance

My DBT Skills groups cover the entire curriculum in one year (42 weeks), which includes the strengthening of the commitment to wellness and psychoeducation, DBT skills training, skills-assisted exposure, with radical acceptance of the past trauma and its effects on their lives.

Finally, we explore the promotion of self-compassion and efforts to prepare for returning to everyday life, to build a life worth living. When a client has graduated from their Intense Trauma Syndrome to the more normative anxiety, career, dating, relationship challenges they are on their way to be fulfilled and satisfied with their lives.

In Balancedialectical Behavioral Training

In Balancedialectical Behavioral Training Certification

The Intense Trauma Syndrome causes people to become quite polarized in their thinking. They often see the world in black and white, all or nothing, right or wrong, good or evil terms. There is not much wiggle room for the vast spectrum of imperfection that exists in all of us! One of the earliest cognitive shifts we work on is the ability to hold OPPOSITE VIEWS in their minds without having a meltdown.

For example, I teach them that it is perfectly all right to love someone, but also hate them at times. It is fine to be in a room of friends or family, and yet feel very lonely. It is not a serious problem to want to go out, and want to stay home.

Prior to learning DBT skills, these opposing thoughts would cause a lot of stress for them, and cause them to feel as if they were having a meltdown. To help them decompress from their polarized inner self-hating dialogue, I have learned to reduce their stress by saying, “You are not having a breakdown, you are having a breakthrough!” This often helps them to reframe the intensity of their emotions into a more helpful view.

What they need to learn is to go within and ask, “What do I need now?” or “How can I make this better?” Instead of saying “What’s wrong with me? Why am I like this? I hate this! I feel crazy! I can’t take it, I want to die!”

Dialectical Behavioral Therapy Pdf

I teach my clients to stop asking WHY questions, but to ask HOW questions instead. When we ask WHY, “Why am I like this? Why don’t I enjoy parties? Why am I so annoying to people? Why is this person ignoring me? Why do people dislike me? “Why am I still single?” they are on a slippery slope into anxiety and depression and possible self-harm.

When they learn to ask HOW questions, they start to change, “How can I make this better?” “How can I be useful?” “How can I learn to stay calm when I am triggered?” The HOW questions lead to discovery, growth, healing and empowerment.

In Balance Dialectical Behavioral Training Reliaslearning

In Conclusion

Training Courses Dialectical Behavior Therapy

In balancedialectical behavioral training programs

Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is a powerful healing modality. From my experience, those clients suffering with BPD are particularly helped by this cognitive restructuring process, since typical pharmacological and talk therapy interventions do not help them very much. From my perspective, DBT really feels like a new software program is slowly downloaded into their minds and replaces their previously corrupted and faulty software that was hurting them.
Copyright © by Lisa Wessan 2019. All rights reserved

Leave a Reply